Stories about pimping at the shrines - Worth ReadingMullah giving book references to justify 'jaffary prostitution.'Mullah justifies 'contract sex' from book he has so much faith in. Urdu lecture on Hidayat TV UK
Scholars beaten up by sunni women for wanting to do mutahBBC report on women who refused to be exploited by mutah justifying mullahs
MUTAH Has Brought Mockery to IslamUllema seen as pimps in their passive reading of books that they know are full of suspect stories and narrations
|
|
3. A FUNNY ARGUMENT TO DEFEND MUTAH
If you click the U Turn arrow you will read a blog in which our advocates of mutah admit that the Nabi never did mutah. A question that since mutah is regarded as a good deed then why did the Nabi never do it. The answer is baffling as the person defending mutah is then saying that it is likley that the records were lost. This level of cheap arguments based on 'may be this or that' to defend mutah are common.
4. CHEAP ONE - LINERS TO DEFEND MUTAH.
Here are some example of cheap one liners used to defend mutah. Some of these one-liners are so crude that it makes you laugh of how silly they are. Click here.
5. WIKIPEDIA
The wikipedia encyclopedia is often edited by users who give it an angle of their own choice. But here is one version that appeared and was later removed by a person who did not like the content against mutah. It describes how both Sunni and Shia narrations come in different types and how the word Istimtah is interpreted according to sectarian bias.
Click here
5. "SHIA PEN"
Most of the websites, like Shia Pen, that attempt to defend mutah will blind people by quoting the same type of hadith from Sunni books. Yet all the quotes rely on one accusations that Umar removed it afer the Nabi had permitted it.
This is a typical argument that we Muslims use to justify anything from books. So if we want to justify the beating of wives we will quote from books without looking at the books from a critical point of view.
So here are wider agruments to challenge all those bookie people who think that Umar gets the credit for removing a dirty things like mutah from Islam.
1. If the argument is that the Nabi allowed it but Umar forbad it then it is also true that the Nabi allowed slavery also. Is it not obvious that the Nabi allowed many things to the Muslims because they were in transition and it took time for them to change. Hence even if the Nabi allowed it does not mean it is a permission forever. Like slavery many things were allowed as society had to be reformed totally and new social structures needed to be formed before changes were made. In other words the Nabi did not break the old house until it was possible to build a new house in it's place.
2. Imam Ali (as) became the official 4th Caliph. He did not bring mutah back after Umar had forbidden it. Why?
3. There are clear hadith in all Sunni books that say that Umar used his words against those particular Companions who fiercly claimed that they were allowed it while the majority of the Companions agreed with him that it was not allowed. Hence, when Umar said: "I forbid you two (or three) things which the Nabi allowed ..." then it was aimed at those who kept claiming it was allowed to them by the Nabi.
4. The historic forensics show that mutah was never considered in any situations that arose in the days of the Nabi. For example he was approached by women to 'marry them' but he did not and often other men would then marry them. If mutah was in vogue then he could at least have done a mutah with them.
5. It is not even considered as an alternative in the Quran when in 4:25 it says that if a man is desperate for sex then he should consider marriage to a slave but it is better to be patient. If mutah was allowed then it would say that do mutah to releave your desperation.
None of these evidences can be ignored by blind following of books and what is claimed by selected number of hadith in Sunni books that on the face contradict each other.
4. CHEAP ONE - LINERS TO DEFEND MUTAH.
Here are some example of cheap one liners used to defend mutah. Some of these one-liners are so crude that it makes you laugh of how silly they are. Click here.
5. WIKIPEDIA
The wikipedia encyclopedia is often edited by users who give it an angle of their own choice. But here is one version that appeared and was later removed by a person who did not like the content against mutah. It describes how both Sunni and Shia narrations come in different types and how the word Istimtah is interpreted according to sectarian bias.
Click here
5. "SHIA PEN"
Most of the websites, like Shia Pen, that attempt to defend mutah will blind people by quoting the same type of hadith from Sunni books. Yet all the quotes rely on one accusations that Umar removed it afer the Nabi had permitted it.
This is a typical argument that we Muslims use to justify anything from books. So if we want to justify the beating of wives we will quote from books without looking at the books from a critical point of view.
So here are wider agruments to challenge all those bookie people who think that Umar gets the credit for removing a dirty things like mutah from Islam.
1. If the argument is that the Nabi allowed it but Umar forbad it then it is also true that the Nabi allowed slavery also. Is it not obvious that the Nabi allowed many things to the Muslims because they were in transition and it took time for them to change. Hence even if the Nabi allowed it does not mean it is a permission forever. Like slavery many things were allowed as society had to be reformed totally and new social structures needed to be formed before changes were made. In other words the Nabi did not break the old house until it was possible to build a new house in it's place.
2. Imam Ali (as) became the official 4th Caliph. He did not bring mutah back after Umar had forbidden it. Why?
3. There are clear hadith in all Sunni books that say that Umar used his words against those particular Companions who fiercly claimed that they were allowed it while the majority of the Companions agreed with him that it was not allowed. Hence, when Umar said: "I forbid you two (or three) things which the Nabi allowed ..." then it was aimed at those who kept claiming it was allowed to them by the Nabi.
4. The historic forensics show that mutah was never considered in any situations that arose in the days of the Nabi. For example he was approached by women to 'marry them' but he did not and often other men would then marry them. If mutah was in vogue then he could at least have done a mutah with them.
5. It is not even considered as an alternative in the Quran when in 4:25 it says that if a man is desperate for sex then he should consider marriage to a slave but it is better to be patient. If mutah was allowed then it would say that do mutah to releave your desperation.
None of these evidences can be ignored by blind following of books and what is claimed by selected number of hadith in Sunni books that on the face contradict each other.
6. MISUSING THE NAME OF OUR IMAMS
Our scholars have fantastic skills to turn anything upside down and justify it. So even the narrations from our Imams that clearly and explicity forbid mutah are either rejected or turned upside down. Hence the saying of Imam Ali Reza (as) forbidding married men from doing mutah is turned on it’s head by our establishment so that the vast majority of married men are still allowed to do it. The way this is done is by tying up what the Imam said to clauses and conditions.
|
Now link this to what the Prophet Muhammad said about your relationship with you wife. Remember, he showed those pagans in Mecca what the value of a wife is when he only stayed with Kadijah in those pagan times. By being loyal to only one wife he showed these pagans what is the meaning of a relationships. He also told his companions that that if anybody commits an injustice to his wife then he will come to Allah with a limp and with his shoulders lowered. So the question is: Does not doing mutah commit an injustice on your wife? Surely, what the Prophet said and what the Imam said are linked and tied together. Surely true Islam of the Prophet and the Imams is about stability in marriage, trust in marriage, life partnership in marriage etc This is clearly what the Prophet and Imams taught. But for our scholars it is okay to have a marriage that it 'temporarily.' This is more in line with pagan ideas of a marriage rather than with the Prophet and Imams taugth.
I have now come to believe that after every Prophet the religous scholars moved in to control the people. They, therefore, re-defined the message of the Prophets. Shia Islam has had the same fate as it is not above the tendencies of human failing that all other societies suffer from. Today our religion is more Mullahism than Islam. The fact that there are so many re-interpretations of what the Imams said and what the Prophet showed by example is evidence that we are following mullahism and not Islam as originally taugth. Very few people realise this as they prefer to lead a life based on false assertions from religious scholars.
I have now come to believe that after every Prophet the religous scholars moved in to control the people. They, therefore, re-defined the message of the Prophets. Shia Islam has had the same fate as it is not above the tendencies of human failing that all other societies suffer from. Today our religion is more Mullahism than Islam. The fact that there are so many re-interpretations of what the Imams said and what the Prophet showed by example is evidence that we are following mullahism and not Islam as originally taugth. Very few people realise this as they prefer to lead a life based on false assertions from religious scholars.